Effects of communities of reflecting peers on student-teacher development – including in-depth case studies

Despite continuing interest in teacher reflection and an extensive body of
research on peer assessment, the interaction between these areas has not been
sufficiently investigated. This study on reflection and peer feedback is part of an
ongoing action research addressing the design and pedagogical model of a
theoretically oriented teacher training course. The course comprised face-to-face
lessons followed by written reflections of the student-teachers concerning their
learning experiences. These reflections were presented for peer feedback -
thereby initiating a community of reflecting peers (‘co-reflection') - and were
additionally subjected to instructor feedback under two conditions (full vs.
diluted). Student-teachers' perception of their professional development that
resulted from these co-reflecting communities were quantitatively evaluated
(using a self-reported questionnaire) over a three-year period. An enhanced
positive effect over the three-year period was found - regardless of the instructor
feedback condition - as well as significant differences between parallel groups
(higher for science vs. mathematics student-teachers). These are described in the
first part of the paper, followed by an in-depth case study analysis in the second
section. The case studies reported inclusive analysis of the students' written
reflections and feedback. It provides an insight into the processes of coreflection,
identifies changes over time in the quality of reflections and feedback,
as well as in the personal, professional and social development of the studentteachers,
attempting to identify the mechanisms leading to these changes.
Examples are cited to illustrate the ways in which the students developed and
what activated their motivation for development. The case studies reveal two
developmental models, one of external orientation and the other internal. These
are characterized by a willing receiver and willing donor, respectively. The
importance of a ‘maturity interval', when the student is ‘ripe' for developmental
change, was also demonstrated. Offering an appropriate trigger at this mature
point may stimulate crucial development. Teacher development is further
interpreted in terms of interpersonal variables. The current paper may encourage
teacher educators and student-teachers themselves to incorporate co-reflecting in
their course planning and community planning. Ways may be designed to train
student-teachers to offer and use feedback effectively. For feedback to be
valuable, it should be reinforcing, challenging, thorough and sincere, radiate
faith, and be of a friendly nature - it should be non-insulting and nonjudgemental.
They may be used for in-text as well as summary remarks